Medvedev’s Stanford Speech: A Medvedev Doctrine In The Making?

No, I'm not going to compare President Medvedev's address at Stanford University to Winston Churchill's famous Fulton Speech.  The speakers couldn't be more different, and the timing was different too.  Besides, Medvedev has chosen a much better school: the U.S. News & World Report ranks Stanford among America's top seven universities,  whereas Westminster College (Fulton, MO), the place of Churchill's oratory, belongs to the so-called Tier 3, the bottom 50% of the nation's universities/colleges.  But most importantly, Churchill's Fulton Speech ushered the dark era of the Cold War, while Medvedev's Stanford talk could not have even occurred if the Cold War wasn't over.

And yet, there is a captivating symbolism in the fact that the President of Russia has used the lectern of an American university to talk about his vision of Russia's future.

This future was presented in the form of 10 theses of which two, I believe, could lay the ground for the yet non-existing "Medvedev Doctrine."  First, Medvedev confirmed that he couldn't see Russia but as a democracy.  He admitted the imperfections and mistakes, but also stressed his commitment to improve Russia's political system and state institutions.  However, in a statement that will surely upset the "democracy-promoting" crowd in Washington DC, he pointed that Russia can (and will) accomplish this goal "without lecturing from outside."

Second, speaking about Russian foreign policy, Medvedev said that "…Russia is striving to become an open country, open for partnership with everyone ready for cooperation."  He also said something that I personally find very important: "…past grievances is the road to self-isolation."

Medvedev can't expect a free ride.  The anti-Russian lobby will use every opportunity to attack his positive agenda.  In the absence of serious negative developments between the U.S. and Russia, two issues will be pumped up constantly: Georgia and "human rights."  (The non-stop criticism of alleged violations of human rights in Russia reminds me of the sound of vuvuzela, a hallmark of the ongoing World Soccer Cup in South Africa.)   A recent Washington Post's editorial has already demanded from the Obama administration to make any further cooperation with Moscow contingent upon Russia's following "Western principles of freedom and human rights" — defined naturally on the Post's terms. 

Writing for the Foreign Policy, the Marshall Fund's David  ("Reseterminator") Kramer continues:

"If Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is serious in wanting our help with his economic modernization agenda, we should insist that he needs to make measurable progress in political liberalization first."

One can easily see what's going to happen should American companies follow Kramer's advice: lucrative Russian contracts will go to their European competitors.  Besides, has it occurred to Kramer that if Russia had made abolition of slavery a condition of its support for the American Revolutionary War, this support would have been delayed for an additional 85 years?

About Eugene Ivanov

Eugene Ivanov is a PMI-certified Innovation Management Consultant who helps organizations increase the efficiency of their internal and external innovation programs.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Medvedev’s Stanford Speech: A Medvedev Doctrine In The Making?

  1. You’re on a roll Eugene.
    Low and behold, the spy bug becomes convenient news:
    On differences – as noted, the US government openly takes issue with Russia on the former Georgian SSR, while erroneously believing that American policy on Kosovo isn’t a relevant comparison.

  2. Alex (not spy) says:

    Spot on & JIT, Eugene! No free ride, indeed – now the desperate Russian spies are trying to learn the State Secret of Secrets – the US Foreign Policy :)) I guess you will have a good harvest in WP about thisl. Cheers
    PS Poor Kramer..:))

  3. Eugene Ivanov says:

    Mike, Alex-
    Thanks! Yeah, this “spy ring” story sucks. Alex, you’re spot on: “negative developments” absent, you just create one.
    Will write something about this, most likely tomorrow.

  4. The document specifies the memo seeks to the current level of 15.6 is well below average and at the lower end of the range established by the last two bull markets.Hammerstein family.

  5. Isn’t he cute? The head is made with the 1 3/4″ circle punch in black and the wide oval punch in white. The beak is the small oval punch. For the body, I used the tag punch in black and the large oval in black for the wing. It’s that easy! The greeting is simply layers of the 1″ circle, 1 1/4″ circle, 1 38″ circle, and scallop circle punches.
    Notice the cool texture on the Rich Razzleberry background? That is done with my Big Shot Die-Cut Madfachine and the new Square Lattice Embossing folder in the Summer mini catalog.

  6. Many people don’t realize the importance of the cork in a wine bottle, but it does play a major role in ensuring your wine stays fresh and ages properly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s