One More Time: What Did Putin Actually Say About Anna Politkovskaya’s Murder?

Today, the Washington Post published two seemingly unrelated, but spiritually linked, articles. 

The first explains why it’s so difficult to debunk popular myths.  A conventional wisdom holds that people absorb information in a deliberate manner.  But multiple scientific studies have shown that, quite to the contrary, the brains can be easily manipulated into believing that false information is true.  One way of doing so is to frequently repeat the false information.  Clever manipulators are aware of the fact and take advantage of it.

The second article is a nice proof of the conclusions of the first.  By criticizing Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika for the troubled investigation of the murder of Anna Politkovskaya, Peter Finn is trying to prove that solving the murder had never been a goal of Russian authorities, including Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Making his point, Finn employs one of the favorite tricks of Western mythologists: ascribing to Putin something that he had actually never said. 

Here is what Finn writes about Putin’s reaction to Politkovskaya’s death:

"On the day Politkovskaya was buried, Putin dismissed her work as ‘extremely insignificant.’  He said her murder bore the hallmarks of a provocation orchestrated abroad and designed to undermine Russia’s reputation."   

I’ve already had a chance to argue that an interpretation of what Putin actually says largely depends on what a Western mythologists wants to say about Putin.  Let’s review again Putin’s exact words about Politkovskaya (according to the transcript of his joint news conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Dresden on October 10, 2006):

" First of all, I would like to say that no matter who committed this crime and no matter what the motives behind it, it was a horribly cruel crime and it cannot go unpunished. […] This journalist was indeed a fierce critic of the current authorities in Russia. But, […], I think, her impact on Russian political life was only very slight. She was well known in the media community, in human rights circles and in the West, but her influence on political life within Russia was very minimal. The murder of someone like her, the brutal murder of a woman and mother, was in itself an act directed against our country and against the Russian authorities."

Does a native English speaker Peter Finn not know the difference between "very slight" or "very minimal" and "extremely insignificant"?  Did a professional journalist accidentally miss "horribly cruel crime"  and "the brutal murder of a woman and mother"?  And which part of the Putin’s quote makes Finn believe that Putin was implying "a provocation orchestrated abroad?"

Over the past few years, the Western coverage of Russia has become nothing but a myth-creating process.  It’s a shame that a gifted journalist like Finn is becoming one of the mythologists.

About Eugene Ivanov

Eugene Ivanov is a PMI-certified Innovation Management Consultant who helps organizations increase the efficiency of their internal and external innovation programs.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to One More Time: What Did Putin Actually Say About Anna Politkovskaya’s Murder?

  1. Jesse Heath says:

    Finn is one of the worst offenders in this regard. I’ve written him more than once to complain about misstatements and misrepresentations of fact in his articles, but he never responds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s